Well, in only took 10 days for the unions and their anti-trade buddies to provide a definitive response to this brilliant "protectionism breeds free trade" defense. And unfortunately for the apologists, that response can be summarized in two words: one starts with the letter "F," and the other is "THAT." Here's BNA (subscription required) with the shocking development:
The Bush administration's failed trade policy should not serve as a starting point for a new U.S. trade policy, labor and public interest groups wrote in a Sept. 22 letter to President Obama.Ouch! Now, I'm no expert at reading union "vibes," but something tells me that Obama's Section 421 decision didn't achieve the massive groundswell of union tradelove that Kirk and Scheiber were hoping for. Indeed, after Buy American, Mexican Trucks, Tires and every other of the thousand protectionist cuts this Administration has allowed in the last nine months, it's still business as usual for the anti-trade crowd. And adding insult to injury, the union that filed the 421 petition - the United Steelworkers - was one of the letter's signatories! That's cold, man. Cold.
The Teamsters, Friends of the Earth U.S., Americans for Democratic Action, United Steelworkers, TransAfrica Forum, and about 10 other groups said in the letter that some administration trade officials had described the "Obama trade agenda" as implementation of the pending Panama, Colombia, and Korea free trade agreements and completion of the Doha Round negotiations of the World Trade Organization.
The groups said that the leftover FTAs, which were negotiated and signed by the Bush administration but never implemented, reflected the unsuccessful end to the past administration's trade policy and should not serve as the starting point for a new U.S. trade policy. ...
The groups advocated for other changes including eliminating extraordinary foreign investor privileges, allowing Buy American policies in government procurement rules, removing provisions that require the United States to accept imported food that does not meet U.S. domestic safety standards, fixing agricultural provisions, and facilitating access to medicine....
The lesson here is simple: the anti-trade crowd is called the "ANTI-TRADE crowd" for a reason. And no amount of small-but-harmful protectionist "gestures" is going to change that. Ever.
No comments:
Post a Comment