So, here’s the full picture. In order to get people to farm, thus providing local food (you know, local is good, right?), in a place which is snow and ice for half the year it is necessary to put up huge trade barriers to food coming in from places with more grass and more cows.Worstall's entire article is worth reading, if only to fully grasp the absurdity of Norway's butter policies and their utterly predictable results. I hope that Norwegians families were still able to make those butter cookies for Christmas, but I'm not holding my breath. In fact, some news reports from earlier this month noted that butter hit over $450 per pound there!
These trade barriers raise the internal price of milk and butter, which is the whole point of having them so as to encourage people to farm in such a frozen wasteland. However, now that you’ve got these incredibly high prices for milk and butter you find that every roadside verge supports a cow or two as the locals cash in on the incredibly high prices. Thus you now need to fine people for producing too much milk.
The fines reduce the amount of milk produced, there is now a shortage of milk and butter and you need to lift the import restrictions so that the citizenry can have a butter biscuit at Christmas time. It really would be simpler just to buy the darn butter from Denmark in the first place, like the UK does....
Update on 12/15. I’ve been sent this very interesting link. It’s to perhaps the Nowegian equivalent of Craigslist. And it shows the offers of butter in, well, it’s not a black market as it’s legal, but a grey market perhaps. 500 NOK ($83.50) for a half kilo, a little over a pound, of butter.
Thank goodness for farmers’ protection, eh?
That's some crazy expensive cookies, folks.
In fact, at about $80/pound for butter, you would have to spend about $1140 on butter alone to make everything in Paula Deen's latest cookbook, which requires a fantastic 57 sticks of butter. At $450/pound, that same cookbook would require over $6400 worth of butter! (Butter's about $3.50/lb here in the United States, despite our own stupid protectionism.)
Now, as bad as Norway's policies are, they are helpful in one sense: they provide a fantastic example of the economic distortions, system-gaming and consumer pains that are the inevitable result of import protectionism. As I've repeatedly mentioned here, the United States maintains high tariffs on lots of fairly-traded products, thus forcing US consumers to pay higher prices for those goods and thereby subsidize well-connected industries (including the US dairy farmers). Those policies haven't caused $450 butter, but they're just as wrong-headed.
So maybe Norway's butter crisis will cause the Norwegian government to wise up and eliminate harmful tariffs on butter and other products. If only the United States would follow suit.